CC2 Phase V Aircraft Loading and Gear Configuration





Back to CC2 Phase V HMA Overlay 


Rubblizing of concrete pavements is a relatively new technique and full-scale trafficking of rubblized airport pavements under heavy airplane loading had not been conducted previously. Design procedures for determining the required thickness of asphalt overlays on rubblized pavements have therefore not been developed in the traditional sense. The most usual assumption (see, for example, FAA EB66) is that the rubblized and overlaid pavement behaves like a flexible pavement and that the overlay thickness can be determined by assigning an equivalent thickness or modulus value to the rubblized layer and applying this in a standard flexible pavement design procedure. In view of the unsubstantiated nature of thickness design for rubblized pavements it was decided to start testing at an arbitrary loading condition and to adjust the loading according to the observed behavior under traffic.


Only four wheels were available for loading on the unrubblized traffic lane, so traffic was begun with a four-wheel dual-tandem configuration on both traffic lanes. The geometry was the same on both traffic lanes, with dual spacing of 54 inches (137.2 cm) and tandem spacing of 57 inches (144.8 cm). Wheel load was set at 55,000 lbs (25 tonnes) because this was the load applied to the new construction CC2 test items and, although badly cracked at the end of trafficking, all of the test items were capable of structurally supporting the loads applied up to the end of trafficking. Adding five inches of asphalt implied that the unrubblized pavement would be capable of structurally supporting considerably more traffic at the same load.


Calculations of the predicted life of the rubblized pavements using the assumptions of flexible pavement response and characteristics indicated that, for the initial traffic loading case, the structure on-grade (MRG) might fail fairly quickly (a few hundreds or thousands of repetitions) but that the structure on stabilized base would probably last for many tens of thousands of repetitions.



Loading Parameters and Gear Configuration

Trafficking started on July 7, 2005, and continued until October 6, 2005, following the schedule in Table 1. (The loading was increased after 5,082 repetitions because none of the pavements showed any significant deterioration at that traffic level.) The standard NAPTF 66-repetitions per cycle wander pattern was used on both traffic lanes. The temperature of the asphalt varied between 66 and 85 degrees F (19 And 29 degrees C) during the period of testing. The average temperature of the asphalt was about 78 degrees F (26 degrees C).


 

CC2 Phase V img5


CC2 Phase V img6



Wander Pattern

Standard wander pattern was used in CC2 Phase V for aircraft trafficking. Wander pattern coordinates can be downloaded here.


CC2 Phase V img7